The Identity of Subject in Aeschylus, Cho. 32–36

Authors

  • Nina A. Almazova St. Petersburg State University, 7–9, Universitetskaya nab., St. Petersburg, 199034, Russian Federation

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21638/11701/spbu20.2018.114

Abstract

In the parodos of the Choephori by Aeschylus the chorus sings of a nightmare that made Clytemnestra send libations to the grave of Agamemnon in a vain attempt to pacify his wrath and escape vengeance. The subject of Cho. 32–36 is described as ὀρθόθριξ δόμων ὀνειρόμαντις, but the identity of the ὀνειρόμαντις is obscure. The text of the passage is not sound, so various emendations have been attempted which presuppose different interpretations of its subject. The proposal of F. Blass to delete Φοῖβος in v. 32 seems the most convincing. This word was probably an interpolation aimed at inserting an explicitly named subject into the text. However, Φοῖβος is most implausible as a subject, since Apollo has nothing to do with grim underworld divinities as well as with sending prophetic dreams. Fear would be semantically suitable, but it is rendered improbable by the words περὶ φόβῳ in v. 35: if inserted into the text, the noun φόβος would become both a subject and a secondary element of the same sentence. Several other candidates proposed so far, such as Clytemnestra, φοῖτος, οἶκτος, are also implausible. The dream of Clytemnestra as a subject suits the context perfectly, but it could be hardly called “an interpreter of dreams”. Yet Aeschylus is fond of rethinking the sense of compounds according to their etymological potential. The paper argues that ὀνειρόμαντις is used in the meaning ‘Dream the prophet’, i.e. ‘prophetic dream’.

Keywords:

Aeschylus, Choephori, Clytemnestra’s nightmare, Greek compounds, ὀνειρόμαντις

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
 

References

D’Arnaud (Arnaldus), G.Specimen animadversionum criticarum ad aliquos scriptores Graecos. Harlingae, 1728 (Amstelaedami, 1730).

Bamberger F. (ed.). Aeschyli Choephori. Gottingae, Vanderhoeck et Ruprecht, 1840.

Bernabé A. (ed.). Poetarum epicorum Graecorum testimonia et fragmenta. Pars I. Leipzig, Teubner, 1987.

Bethe E. (ed.). Pollucis Onomasticon. Vol. II: Libri VI–X. Stuttgart; Leipzig, Teubner, 1931.

Blass F. W. Zu Aischylos Choephoren. Hermes. 1898, 33, 179–182.

Blass F. W. (ed., comm.). Aeschylos’ Choephoren. Halle a. d. S., Niemeyer, 1906.

Blomfield C. J. (ed., comm.). Aeschyli Choephoroe. Londini, Taylor, 18343.

De Borries I. (ed.). Phrynichi Praeparatio sophistica. Lipsiae, Teubner, 1911.

Bothe F. H. (ed., comm.). Aeschyli dramata quae supersunt. Lipsiae, Weidmann, 1805.

Bothe F. H. (ed.). Poetae Scaenici Graecorum. Vol. X. Lipsiae, Hahn, 1831.

Bowen A. (ed.). Aeschylus. Choephori. Bristol, Bristol Classical Press, 1986.

Casevits M. Les mots du rêve en grec ancient. Ktéma 1982, 7, 67–73.

Conington J. Aeschylus. The Choephoroe. London, Parker and Son, 1857.

Diggle E. (ed.). Euripidis Fabulae. Vol. III. Oxonii, Clarendon Press, 1994.

Dindorf G. (ed.). Aeschyli tragoediae. Lipsiae, Teubner, 18806.

Finglass P. J. ; Davies, M. (ed., comm.). Stesichorus. The Poems. Cambridge, University Press, 2014.

Fraenkel E. (ed., comm.). Aeschylus. Agamemnon. Vol. I–III. Oxford, 1950.

Garvie A. F. The Opening of the Choephori. BICS 1970, 17, 79–91.

Garvie A.F.(ed., comm.). Aeschylus. Choephori. Oxford, 1986.

Groeneboom P. (ed., comm.). Aeschylus’ Choephoroi. Groningen, Batavia, Wolters, 1949.

Headlam A., Thomson, G.(ed., comm.). The Oresteia of Aeschylus. Vol.I–II.Cambridge, University Press, 1938.

Hermann G. Recension einer Antikritik und zweyer Recensionen von Herrn K.O.Müller, in: Godofredi Hermanni Opuscula. Vol. VII. Lipsiae, Fleischer, 1839, 25–64.

Hermann G. (ed.). Aeschyli Tragoediae. Vol. II. Lipsiae, Weidmann, 1852.

Herwerden H. van. In Aeschylum observationes veteres atque novae. Mnem. 1896, 24, 31–54.

Heyse T. Die Orestie des Aeschylus. Halle, 1884.

Italie G. Index Aeschyleus. Curavit S. L. Radt. Leiden, Brill, 19642.

Jongh A. de. Aeschyli Choephorae, cum interpretatione Latina et annotatione. Trajecti ad Rhenum, Kemink et filius, 1856.

Kenner H. Oneiros, RE 1939, 18, 448–459.

Kirchhoff A. (ed.). Aeschyli tragoediae. Berolini, Weidmann, 1880.

Klausen R. H. (ed.). Aeschyli quae supersunt. Vol. I, sect. II: Choephorae. Gothae et Erfordiae, Hennings, 1835.

Kühner R. Ausführliche Grammatik der griechischen Sprache, Tl. 1. Elementar- und Formenlehre. Bd. 2, in neuer Bearb. besorgt von F. Blass. Hannover, Hahn, 18923.

Lachmann C. De choricis systematis tragicorum Graecorum libri quattuor. Berolini, Reimer, 1819.

Lee K. H. (ed.). Euripides. Hercules. Leipzig, Teubner, 1988.

Lloyd-Jones H., Wilson N. G. (eds.). Sophoclis Fabulae. Oxonii, Clarendon Press, 1990.

Mazon P. (ed., tr.). Eschyle. Vol.II. Agamemnon — Les choéphores — Les Euménides. Paris, Belles Lettres, 1993.

Müller K. O. Rec. Choephorae, ed. R. Klausen, Gothae 1835. Zeitschrift für die Alterthumswissenschaft. 1836, 1–5, 14–44.

Murray G. (ed.). Aeschyli septem quae supersunt tragoediae. Oxonii, Clarendon Press, 19372.

Page D. (ed.). Aeschyli septem quae supersunt tragoediae. Oxford, University Press, 1972.

Paley A. (ed., comm.). The Tragedies of Aeschylus. London, Whittaker and Co., 1879.

Pauw J. C. de (ed.). Aeschyli Tragoediae superstites. Hagae Comitum, 1745.

Porson R. (ed.). Aeschyli tragoediae septem cum versione Latina. Vol. II. London, Payne, 1806.

Portus F. Commentaria in Aeschyli tragoedias (inedita). Lugd. Bat. Bibl. Univ. B. P. L. 180 (post 1568).

Rose H. J. A Commentary on the Surviving Plays of Aeschylus. Amsterdam, N. V. Noord-Hollandische Uitgevers Maatschappij, 1958.

Rutherford I. Pindar’s Paean. A reading of the fragments with a survey of the genre. Oxford, University Press, 2001.

Schütz Chr. G. (ed., comm.). Aeschyli tragoediae quae supersunt. Londini, Whittaker, 1823.

Schuursma I. A. De poetica vocabulorum abusione apud Aeschylum. Amstelodami, Paris, 1932.

Schwyzer E. Griechische Grammatik. Bd. 1. Allgemeiner TeIl. Lautlehre. Wortbildung. Flexion. München, Beck, 19536.

Sidgwick A. Aeschyli tragoediae. Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1915.

Stanley Th. Aeschyli quae extant. London, Flesher, 1663.

Stanley Th., Butler, S. (eds.). Aeschyli tragoediae quae supersunt. T. V. Cantabrigiae, typis ac sumptibus Academicis, 1812.

Stockert W. (ed.). Euripides. Iphigenie in Aulis. Vol. I–II. Vienna, Die Österreichische Akademie der Wissenschaften, 1992.

Stolz W. Beiträge zur griechischen Wortzusammensetzung und Wortbildung, WSt 1904, 26, 169–184.

Tucker T. G. The Choephori of Aeschylus. With Critical Notes, Commentary, Translation and a Recension of the Scholia. Cambridge, University Press, 1901.

Turnebus A. Αἰσχύλου Τραγῳδίαι ς’. Parisiis, 1552.

Untersteiner M. (ed., tr.). Eschilo. Le Coefore. Vol. I. Como — Milano, Marzorati, 1947

Verrall A. W. (ed., comm., tr.). The ‘Choephori’ of Aeschylus. London — New York, Macmillan, 1893.

Weil H. (ed.). Aeschyli quae supersunt tragoediae. Vol. I sect. II. Choephori. Gissae, Ricker, 1860.

Weil H. (ed.). Aeschyli tragoediae. Lipsiae, Teubner, 1903.

Weir Smyth, H. (tr.). Aeschylus. Tragoediae. Vol. II: Agamemnon — Libation-Bearers — Eumenides — Fragments. Appendix and addendum by H.Lloyd-Jones. Cambridge, MA; London, Harvard University Press, 1926.

West M. L. (ed.). Aeschyli tragoediae. Stuttgardiae et Lipsiae, Teubner, 1998.

Wilamowitz-Moellendorff U. von (ed., comm.). Euripides. Herakles. Berlin, Weidmann, 1895.

Wilamowitz-Moellendorff U.von (ed., tr.). Aischylos. Orestie. Zweites Stück. Das Opfer am Grabe. Berlin, Weidmann, 1896.

Wilamowitz-Moellendorff U. von (ed.). Aeschyli Tragoediae. Berolini, Weidmann, 1914.

Winnington-Ingram R. P. The Role of Apollo in the Oresteia. ClR 1933, 47, 97–104.

Downloads

Published

2018-06-27

How to Cite

Almazova, N. (2018). The Identity of Subject in Aeschylus, Cho. 32–36. Philologia Classica, 13(1), 181–188. https://doi.org/10.21638/11701/spbu20.2018.114

Issue

Vol. 13 No. 1 (2018)

Section

Miscellanea

License

Articles of "Philologia Classica" are open access distributed under the terms of the License Agreement with Saint Petersburg State University, which permits to the authors unrestricted distribution and self-archiving free of charge.