Soph. Ant. 471 and Aeschylus’ Oedipus

Authors

  • Zoia A. Barzakh University of Tel-Aviv, preparatory division, 30, Haim Levanon, Tel-Aviv, Israel

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21638/11701/spbu20.2017.101

Abstract

The article is dedicated to the interpretation of Soph. Ant. 471–2. The main problems posed by these verses are the meaning of the epithet ὠμός, the ambiguous reference to Oedipus and the comparison of Antigone to him. Basing on lexicological analysis and interpretation of the context, the author rejects the understanding of ὠμός as “savage, uncivilized” which became popular in the last decades. Meanwhile, the author assumes that this extravagant explanation has diagnostic value, and supposes that we cannot fully understand the meaning of these lines, since we do not possess the tragedy they refer to. The author explains these verses as a reference to the lost Aeschylus’ Oedipus. In this case, the ὠμότης of Oedipus referred to consists in his curse on his sons, who, according to the testimonies of Aeschylus’ Septem and the Scholia to Sophocles’ Oedipus at Colonus, refused to provide proper maintenance for him when he found himself in helpless state in their care. The author prefers this interpretation of Sept. 778–87 to the alternative one, which understands τροφή not as “care, maintenance”, but as “origin”. Refs 47.

Keywords:

Aeschylus, Antigone, Oedipus, Sophocles, Seven Against Thebes

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
 

References

Bierl A., Latacz J. (Hrsg.) Homers Ilias. Gesamtkommentar. Bd. 6,1: 19. Gesang. Berlin, W. de Gruyter, 2009.

Blake Tyrell W., Bennet L.J. Recapturing Sophocles’ Antigone. Oxford, Rowman and Littlefield Publishers, 1998.

Bowman L. M. The Curse of Oedipus in ‘Oedipus at Colonus’. Scholia 2007, 16, 15–21.

Bruzzese L. Dai Sette contro Tebe de Eschilo all’ Antigone di Sofocle: la dualita nel mito dei Labdacidi, in: A. M. Belardinelli, G. Greco (ed.) Antigone e le Antigoni. Milano, Mondadori, 2010, 190–215.

Burnett A. Curse and Dream in Aeschylus’ Septem. GRBS 1973, 14, 343–368.

Buxton R. Similes and Other Likenesses, in: R. Fowler (ed.) A Cambridge Companion to Homer. Cambridge, CUP, 2004.

Cairns D. From Solon to Sophocles: Intertextuality and Interpretation in Sophocles’ Antigone. Japan Studies in Classical Antiquity 2014, 2, 3–29.

Cairns D. The Bloody Dust of the Nether Gods: Sophocles, Antigone 599–603, in: E.Emilsson (ed.) Paradeigmata. Studies in Honour of O. Andersen. Athens 2014, 39–51.

Céu Fialho M.do. Paidotrophia and Gerotrophia: Reciprocity and Disruption in Attic Tragedy, in: E. M. Herris et al. (ed.) Law and Drama in Ancient Greece. London, Bloomsbery 2013, 108–121.

Christ W. Geschichte der Griechischen Literatur. München, Beck’sche Verlagsbuchhandlung, 1890.

Christian F. La double fraternité d’ Étéocle et de Polynice (les Sept contre Thebes v. 576–579). REG 1977, 90, 211–222.

Diller H. Thebanerinnen und Danaiden: Zwei Frauenchoren des Aeschylos. Würzburger Jahrbücher für die Altertumswissenschaft 1975, NF 1, 33–43.

Dovatur A. I. Nasledstvennaia vina v predstavlenii Solona, Feognida, Eskhila [The Inherited Guilt in Solon, Theognis, Aeschylus], Philologia Classica 1977, 1, 36–45 (in Russian).

Dunn F.M. Dynamic Allusion in Sophocles, in: A.Markantonatos (ed.) Brill’s Companion to Sophocles. Leiden–Boston, Brill, 2012, 263–282.

Gantz T. The Aeschylean Tetralogy: Attested and Conjectured Groups, in: M.Lloyd (ed.), Oxford Readings in Classical Studies: Aeschylus, Oxford, OUP, 2007, 40–70.

Garne R. Ancestral Fault in Ancient Greece. Cambridge, CUP, 2013.

Griffiths P.J. Theban Legend in Greek Tragedy. Thesis, Hamilton, 1968, https://macsphere.mcmaster.ca/bitstream/11375/9938/1/fulltext.pdf (15.06.2017)

Hanink G., Uhlig A. “My Poetry did not die with me”: Aeschylus and his Afterlife in the Classical Period, in: S. Constantinidis (ed.) The Reception of Aeschylus’ Plays through Shifting Models and Frontiers, Leiden, Brill, 2016, 51–79.

Hutchinson G. O. (ed.) Aeschylus. Septem contra Thebas. Oxford, OUP, 1985.

Jebb R. C. (ed., comm.) Sophocles. The Plays and Fragments. Part III. The Antigone. Cambridge, CUP, 1891.

Johansson K. The Birds in the Iliad. Identities, Interactions and Functions. Gothenburg, University of Gothenburg, 2012.

Kamerbeek J. C. The Plays of Sophocles. The Commentary. Part III. The Antigone. Leiden, Brill, 1978.

Kirk G. S. The Iliad: A Commentary. Volume III: Books 5–8. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1990.

Lamari A. “Early Reperformances of Drama in the Fifth Century.” CHS Research Bulletin 2014, 2. http://www.chs-fellows.org/2014/06/20/early-reperformances-of-drama-in-the-fifth-century (15.06.2017)

Lardinois A. P. M. Antigone, in: K. Ormand (ed.) A Companion to Sopocles, Oxford, OUP 2012, 55–68.

Liapis V. Creon the Labdacid: Political Confrontation and the Doomed Oikos in Sophocles’ Antigone, in: D. L. Cairns (ed.) Tragedy and Archaic Greek Thought, Swansea, Classical Press of Wales, 2013.

Liapis V. “Nothing that is not Zeus”: The Unknowability of the Gods and the Limits of Human Knowledge in Sophoclean Tragedy. PhD Thesis, Glasgow 1997, http://theses.gla.ac.uk/615/1/1997liapisphd.pdf (16.06.2017)

Luck-Huyse K. Der Traum vom Fliegen in der Antike. Stuttgart, F. Steiner, 1997.

McDonald S. Finding Freedom: Hegel’s Philosophy and the Emancipation of Women. Montreal, McGill–Queen’s University Press, 2008.

Müller C.W. Die thebanische Trilogie des Sophokles und ihre Aufführung im Jahre 401. RhM 1996, 139, 193–224.

Oberdick J. De exitu fabulae Aeschyleae quae Septem adversus Thebas inscribitur commentatio. Jahresberichte über das Königlische Laurentianum 1877, 3–16.

Oudemans Th. C. W., Lardinois A. P. M. Tragic Ambiguity: Anthropology, Philosophy and Sophocles’ Antigone. Leiden, Brill, 1987.

Palladini L. P. Aesch. Sept. 778–787. Lexis 2014, 32, 126–143.

Palladini L. P. De scholio ad Sophoclis Oedipum Coloneum 1375. Latinitas 2015, N. S. III, 17–24.

Petridou G. On Divire Epiphanies: Contextualizing an Conceptualizing Epiphanic Narratives in Greek Literature and Culture (7th С BC — 2nd С AD): Diss., Exeter, Univ. of Exeter, 2006.

Phillimore J. S. (transl., comm.) The Athenian Drama. Vol. II. Sophocles. London, G. Allen, 1902.

Rader R. E. Shadows of the Son: Aeschylus, Genealogy, History. Diss. Ohio State University 2007. https://etd.ohiolink.edu/rws_etd/document/get/osu1189987057/inline (16.06.2017)

Robert W. Human, Life and Other Sacred Staff. Journal for Cultural and Religious Theory 10, 2009, 7–23.

Robert W. Trials: of Antigone and Jesus. New York, Fordham University Press, 2010.

Rosenmeyer T. G. The Art of Aeschylus. Berkeley, University of California Press, 1982.

Sommerstein A. Aeschylean Tragedy. New York, Bristol Classical Press, 2013.

Taplin O. Aeschylean Silences and Silences of Aeschylus. HSCP 1972, 76, 57–98.

Torrance I. Aeschylus: Seven against Thebes. London, Duckworth, 2007.

Tucker T. B. (intr., notes and comm.) The Seven against Thebes of Aeschylus. Cambridge, CUP, 1908.

Winnington–Ingram R.P. Septem contra Thebas, in: T.Gould, C.J.Herrengton (ed.) Greek Tragedy. Cambridge, CUP, 1977, 1–46.

Zeitlin F.I. Patterns of Gender in Aeschylean Drama: Seven against Thebes and the Danaid Trilogy, in: M. Griffith, D. Mastronarde (ed.) Cabinet of the Muses: Essays on Classical and Comparative Literature in Honor of Th. G. Rosenmeyer. Atlanta, Scholars Press, 1990, 103–115.

Zimmermann C. Der Antigone-Mythos in der antiken Literatur und Kunst. Tübingen, Gunter Narr Verlag, 1993.

Downloads

Published

2018-06-20

How to Cite

Barzakh, Z. (2018). Soph. Ant. 471 and Aeschylus’ Oedipus. Philologia Classica, 12(1), 4–11. https://doi.org/10.21638/11701/spbu20.2017.101

Issue

Section

Graecia antiqua