Altgriechische Brieftheorie in der Renaissance: Characteres Epistolici von Pseudo-Libanios in lateinischen Übersetzungen des 16. Jahrhunderts

Authors

  • Dmitri Chernoglazov St. Petersburg State University, 7–9, Universitetskaya nab., St. Petersburg, 199034, Russian Federation

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21638/11701/spbu20.2019.208

Abstract

Ancient Greek epistolary theory played an important part in the coming to be of ars epistolandi of the Renaissance. The reception of Greek letter-writing manuals in the Latin literature of the 15th — 16th cc. remains largely unstudied. This paper analyses seven 16th c. Latin translations of “Epistolary Styles” of Pseudo-Libanius / Pseudo-Proclus (abbr. PL), five surviving in printed editions and two in manuscripts. The study aims at generalising on the working principles of translators and voicing possible intentions behind their work. The methods of the translators are very different: the earliest translation by Pontico Virunio is extremely literal. Other translators (e.g. Wolfgang Winthauser) treat the original more freely, sometimes transforming and supplementing the text to clarify the meaning and add rhetorical flourish. Unlike other translators, John Sambucus completely rearranges the treatise: he transforms its structure and distributes the types of letters into five genera. This classification, dating back to Aristotle, is present in some 16th c. Latin manuals, including that of Erasmus. Probably Sambucus introduces this system in order to harmonise the ancient treatise with modern epistolary theory. The classification is repeated in an additional table on letter types, where Sambucus includes 23 types absent from the main text of PL. Their origin is discussed in the article. The methods of translators and the content of 16th c. collections, which include PL translations, indicate that the ancient treatise was translated and published primarily as a school manual. It probably functioned as a link between grammar and rhetoric and introduced the student to more extensive contemporary manuals, for example, Erasmus’ treatise.

Keywords:

Epistolary theory, Pseudo-Libanius, Greek letter writing manuals, Latin translations, Renaissance, Erasmus of Rotterdam, Pontico Virunio, Johannes Sambucus

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
 

References

Almási G. The uses of humanism: Johannes Sambucus (1531–1584), Andreas Dudith (1533–1589), and the republic of letters in East Central Europe. Leiden — Boston, Brill, 2009.

Baños P. M. El arte epistolar en el Renacimiento europeo 1400–1600. Bilbao, Univ. de Deusto, 2005.

Berger F. Katalog der griechischen Handschriften der Bayerischen Staastsbibliothek München. Band 9, Codices graeci Monacenses 575–650 (Handschriften des Supplements). Wiesbaden, Harrassowitz Verlag, 2014.

Camargo M. The Waning of the Ars Dictaminis. Rhetorica 2001, 19–2, 135–140.

Canart P. Codices Vaticani graeci. Codices 1745–1962. Vaticano, In Bybibliotheca Vaticana, 1970.

Cantarella R.P. Andrea Perzivale S.J. (Sitia Creta 1599 — Palermo 1669). Contributo alla storia degli studii Greci in Italia nel. s. XVII. Μύσων. 1932, 1, 89–128.

Chernoglazov D.A. Ancient Epistolary Theory in the Byzantine School: Pseudo-Libanios’ Manual and its Later Versions. Philologia Classica 2018, 13–2, 265–275.

Chernoglazov D.A. Die Byzantinische Fassung des spätantiken Briefstellers: Überlieferung und Textgeschichte. Philologia Classica 2017, 12–2, 188–205.

Fernandes Pereira B. As Orações de Obediência de Aquiles Estaço. Coimbra, Instituto Nacional de Investigação Científica. Centro de Estudos Clássicos e Humanísticos da Universidade de Coimbra, 1991.

Foerster R., Richtsteig E. (eds). Libanii Opera omnia. Vol. IX. Leipzig, Teubner, 1927.

Green L. D., Murphy J. J. Renaissance Rhetoric Short-Title Catalogue 1460–1700. Ashgate, 2006

Grünbart M. Formen der Anrede im byzantinischen Brief vom 6. bis zum 12. Jahrhundert. Wien, Verlag der Österr. Akad. der Wiss., 2005.

Gulyás, P. Bibliotheca Joannis Sambuci. Sámboky János könyvtára. Budapest, author’s edition, 1941.

Hartmann F. Ars dictaminis: Briefsteller und verbale Kommunikation in den italienischen Stadtkommunen des 11. bis 13. Jahrhunderts. Ostfildern, Jan Thorbecke Verlag, 2013.

Καρποζήλου, Μ. Ανιχνεύοντας τό πρότυπο καί καταγράφοντας τήν τύχη τού Έπιστολαρίου τού Κορυδαλέα. In: Μεσαιωνικά και Νέα Ελληνικά. Τ. 8. Πρακτικά του επιστημονικού συμποσίου Νεοελληνική επιστολογραφία (16ος — 19ος αι.). Αθήνα, 2006, 125–149.

Koskenniemi H. Studien zur Idee und Phraseologie des griechischen Briefes bis 400 n. Chr. Helsinki 1956.

Mack P. A History of Renaissance Rhetoric, 1380–1620. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2011.

Malherbe A. J. Ancient Epistolary Theorists. Atlanta, Scholars Press, 1988.

Malosse P.-L. (introd., trad. et comm.) Les traités épistolaires du Pseudo-Libanios et du Pseudo-Démétrios de Phalère. Paris, 2004.

Manoussacas M. Contribution à l’étude de l’épistolographie néohellenique. Thèse pour le Doctorat d’Université présentée à la Faculté des Lettres de l’Université de Paris. Paris, 1951.

Murphy J. J. Rhetoric in the Middle Ages: a history of rhetorical theory from Saint Augustine to the Renaissance. Berkeley, University of Calig Press, 1981.

Rabe H. Aus Rhetoren-Handschriften: 9. Griechische Briefsteller. Rheinisches Museum für Philologie 1909, 64, 284–309.

Stefec R.S. Katalog der griechischen Handschriften der Universitätsbibliothek Augsburg, in: Codices manuscripti et impressi 2014, 93/94, 54–65.

Studemund G., Cohn L. Die Handschriften-Verzeichnisse der Königlichen Bibliothek zu Berlin. Bd. 11. Verzeichniss der griechischen Handschriften. Berlin, 1890.

Sykutris J. Proklos περὶ ἐπιστολιμαίου χαρακτῆρος. Byzantinisch-neugriechische Jahrbücher 7 (1928/1929) 108–118.

Thraede K. Grundzüge griechisch-römischer Brieftopik. München, Beck, 1970.

Tramontana A. Pontico Virunio tra storia, mito e letteratura (Biblioteca umanistica, 18). Messina, Centro Internazionale di Studi Umanistici, 2017.

Weichert V. (ed.). Demetrii et Libanii qui feruntur Τύποι ἐπιστολικοί et Ἐπιστολιμαῖοι χαρακτῆρες. Lipsiae, Teubner, 1910.

Viskolcz N. The Fate of Johannes Sambucus’ Library. Hungarian Studies 2016, 30–2, 155–166.

Zilliacus H. Untersuchungen zu den abstrakten Anredeformen und Höflichkeitstiteln im Griechischen. Helsingfors, Societas Scientiarum Fennica, 1949.

Downloads

Published

2020-01-22

How to Cite

Chernoglazov, D. (2020). Altgriechische Brieftheorie in der Renaissance: Characteres Epistolici von Pseudo-Libanios in lateinischen Übersetzungen des 16. Jahrhunderts. Philologia Classica, 14(2), 280–298. https://doi.org/10.21638/11701/spbu20.2019.208

Issue

Vol. 14 No. 2 (2019)

Section

Antiquitas perennis

License

Articles of "Philologia Classica" are open access distributed under the terms of the License Agreement with Saint Petersburg State University, which permits to the authors unrestricted distribution and self-archiving free of charge.