Arist. Poet. 1454a31–33 Again

  • Tatiana V. Kostyleva St. Petersburg State University, 7–9, Universitetskaya nab., St. Petersburg, 199034, Russian Federation; National Research University “Higher School of Economics”, 123, nab. Kanala Griboedova, St. Petersburg, 190068, Russian Federation


Among the examples on how not to portray a character in tragedy, Aristotle names the female protagonist of the Iphigenia in Aulis, claiming that she is drawn in violation of the principle of consistency: begging to spare her life she is much unlike her later self. Philologists stood for Euripides, charging Aristotle with a lack of intuitive understanding. Moreover, as has been pointed out, the unaffected character of Iphigenia’s behaviour could find a footing in the ample observations on human psychology Aristotle himself made elsewhere in the Ethics and Rheth­oric. Certain modern scholars, however, tend to side with Aristotle. To argumentatively prove or disprove the feasibility of the change Iphigenia undergoes seems thus to be close to impos­sible, both psychologically and aesthetically. A thought not alien to the Poetics goes as simple as that: not all the shifts and turns, so human and so easily observed in life, should find their way into art. One supposes Aristotle all too well recognised the fact that no example would in this case prove to be free of blame, while holding that the general applicability and inherent veracity of his theory goes unimpaired by the fact that it could in principle be assailed.


Данные скачивания пока недоступны.


Bywater I. (ed., transl., comment.) Aristotle on the Art of Poetry. Oxford, OUP, 1909.

Diggle J. (ed.) Euripidis fabulae tomus III. Oxonii, OUP, 1994.

Else G. F. (ed., comm.) Aristotle’s Poetics: The Argument. Cambridge, Mass., CUP, 1957.

Funke H. Aristoteles zu Euripides’ Iphigeneia in Aulis. Hermes 1964, 92, 284–299.

Gibert J. Change of Mind in Greek Tragedy, Hypomnemata 108, 1995.

Günther H. Ch. Euripides Iphigenia Aulidensis. Leipzig, Teubner, 1988.

Kassel R. (ed.) Aristotelis De arte poetica liber. Oxford, OUP, 1965.

Knox B. M. W. Second Thoughts in Greek Tragedy. GRBS 1966, 7, 213–232.

Kovacs D. Toward a Reconstruction of “Iphigenia Aulidensis”. JHS 2003, 123, 77–103.

Kovacs D. (rev.) The OCT Euripides, CR 1998, 48, 270–272.

Lefkowitz M. Women in Greek Myth. Baltimore, Johns Hopkins UP, 1986.

Lesky A. Psychologie bei Euripides, in: Entretiens sur l’antiquité classique, Tome VI, Euripide. Vandoeuvres–Genève, Fondation Hardt, 1958, 123–168.

Lucas D. W. (comm.) Aristotle, “Poetics” . Oxford, OUP, 21972.

Markland J. (ed., not.) Euripidis Supplices mulieres, Iphigenia in Aulide et in Tauris. Oxonii, OUP, 1811.

Mastronarde D. (rev.) Euripidis Fabulae, tomus III by J. Diggle: Euripides: Cyclops, Alcestis, Medea by David Kovacs. CJ 1996–1997, 92, 201–206.

Minio-Paluello L. (ed.) Aristoteles. De Arte Poetica Guillelmo de Moerbeke interprete. Bruges — Paris, Desclée de Brouwer, 1953.

McDonald M. Iphigenia’s Philia: Motivation in Euripides’ Iphigenia in Aulis. Quaderni Urbinati di Cultura Classica 1990, 34, 69–84.

Ross W. D. (ed.) Aristotelis ars rhetorica. Oxonii, OUP, 1964.

Sansone D. Iphigeneia Changes Her Mind. ICS 1991, 16, 161–172.

Schmitt A. (übers., erl.) Aristoteles. Poetik. Berlin, Akademie Verlag, 2008.

Schoder R. V. Literary Sources cited by Aristotle in the Poetics. CJ 1969, 65, 75.

Stockert W. (ed., comment.) Euripides Iphigenie in Aulis, Bd. I–II. Wiener Studien, Bh. 16. Wien, Verlag der ÖAdW, 1992.

Tarán L., Gutas D. (eds). Aristotle Poetics. Editio Maior of the Greek Text with Historical Introductions and Philological Commentaries. Mnemosyne Suppl. 338. Leiden — Boston, Brill, 2012.

von Wilamowitz-Moellendorff U. Einleitung in die Griechische Tragödie. Berlin, Weidmann, 1906.

Как цитировать
Kostyleva, T. V. (2021). Arist. Poet. 1454a31–33 Again. Philologia Classica, 15(2), 411-415.