ἀνά τε ἔδραμεν: Explaining the Longevity of the Tmesis

Authors

  • Maria N. Kazanskaya Institute for Linguistic Studies of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 9, Tuchkov per., St Petersburg, 199004, Russian Federation

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu20.2022.104

Abstract

It is a well-known fact that tmesis (independent use of the preverb from its verb) as a linguistic phenomenon was progressively eliminated from Ancient Greek, so that only residual usage is attested in the language of the Classical age. However, one verb, ἀναδραμεῖν, retained tmetic usage with the particle τε intervening between the preverb and the verb, ἀνά τε ἔδραμε, until late Antiquity (Appian, Eunapius). It is significant that this construction (on par with the non tmetic form ἀνέδραμε) was used in prose, which suggests that it was part of actual linguistic usus. The article examines the reasons behind the unique longevity of this tmesis. Followingan overview of the occurrences of ἀνά τε ἔδραμεν in Herodotus, Appian and Eunapius, and the comparison of the use of the tmetic and non tmetic forms, the elements of the construction are discussed. It is shown that the survival of ἀνά τε ἔδραμεν must have been influenced by the semantic development of the verb (the root no longer denotes actual running, but springing to one’s feet or rapid growth), as well as the capacity of the preverb ἀνα- to appear independently of its verb (the deontic ἄνα). Finally, a possible shift in meaning of τε (as invariable part of the expression) is discussed. While it is impossible to pinpoint one single factor that determined the singular longevity of the tmesis ἀνά τε ἔδραμε in Greek, a combination of factors seems to have contributed to its survival.

Keywords:

ἀναδραμεῖν, ἀνά τε ἔδραμε, tmesis, Homer, Herodotus, Appian, Eunapius, deontic ἄνα

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
 

References

Aly W. Volksmärchen, Sage und Novelle bei Herodot und seinen Zeitgenossen: Eine Untersuchung über die volkstümlichen Elemente der altgriechischen Prosaerzählung. Göttingen, Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1921.

Bertrand N. On tmesis, word order, and noun incorporation in Homeric Greek, in: A. Bartolotta (ed.) The Greek Verb Morphology, Syntax, and Semantics. Proceedings of the 8th International Meeting on Greek Linguistics, Agrigento, October 1–3, 2009. Louvain, Peeters, 2014. 11–30.

Blockley R. C. (ed., tr., comm.) The Fragmentary Classicising Greek Historians of the Later Roman Empire: Eunapius, Olympiodorus, Priscus and Malchus. Vol. II: Text, Translation, and Historiographical Notes (ARCA Classical and Medieval Texts, Papers and Monographs, 10). Liverpool, Francis Cairns, 1983.

Chantraine P. Dictionnaire étymologique de la langue grecque: histoire des mots. Vol. I–IV. Paris, Klincksieck, 1968–1977.

Chantraine P. Grammaire homérique. T. II: Syntaxe. Paris, Klincksieck, 1953.

Conti L. Zum adverbialen Gebrauch von ἀνά bei Homer. Glotta 2015, 91, 27–45.

Denniston J. D. The Greek Particles. 2Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1954.

Duhoux Y. Autour de la tmèse grecque: situation dialectale à l’époque mycénienne ; datation de l’épopée. In: L. Isebaert, R. Lebrun (éds) Quaestiones Homericae: Acta Colloquii Namurcensis. Louvain — Namur, Peeters, 1998. 71–80.

Finglass P. J. (ed., comm.) Sophocles Ajax, edited with Introduction, Translation, and Commentary. Cambridge — New York, CUP, 2011.

Hajnal I. Die Tmesis bei Homer und auf den mykenischen Linear B Tafeln — ein chronologisches Paradox? In: J. H. W. Penney (ed.) Indo-European Perspectives: Studies in Honour of Anna Morpurgo Davies. Oxford, OUP, 2004. 146–178.

Hilgard A. (ed.) Scholia in Dionysii Thracis artem grammaticam. Leipzig, B. G. Teubner, 1901.

Horrocks G. Homer’s Dialect, in: I. Morris, B. Powell (eds) A New Companion to Homer. Leiden — New York — Köln, Brill, 1997. 193–217.

Horrocks G. The Antiquity of the Greek Epic Tradition: Some New Evidence. PCPS 1980, 26 (206), 1–11.

LSJ 1996 — Liddell H. G. Scott, R. A Greek-English Lexicon, revised and augmented by H. G. Jones, with the assistance of R. McKenzie and the cooperation of many scholars. Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1996.

Monro D. B. A Grammar of the Homeric Dialect. 2Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1891.

Morpurgo Davies A. Mycenaean and Greek Language, in: A. Morpurgo Davies, Y. Duhoux (eds) Linear B: A 1984 Survey. Louvain-la-Neuve, Cabay, 1985. 75–125.

Parker L. P. E. (ed., comm.) Euripides, Alcestis: With Introduction and Commentary. Oxford, Clarendon Press, 2007.

Priestley J. Tmesis in Herodotus. Glotta 2009, 85, 118–178.

Ruijgh C. J. Autour de ‘τε épique’: études sur la syntaxe grecque. Amsterdam, Adolf M. Hakkert, 1971.

Schwyzer E., Debrunner A. Griechische Grammatik auf der Grundlage von Karl Brugmanns Griechischer Grammatik. Bd. II: Syntax und syntaktische Stilistik. 5. Aufl. München, C. H. Beck, 1988.

Smyth H. W. A Greek Grammar for Colleges. New York — Cincinnati — Chicago, American Book Company, 1920.

van Ophuijsen J. M. Stork, P. Linguistics into Interpretation: Speeches of War in Herodotus VII 5 & 8–18. Leiden —Boston — Köln, Brill, 1999.

Wackernagel J. Lectures on Syntax, with Special Reference to Greek, Latin, and Germanic / ed. with notes and bibliography by D. Langslow. Oxford, OUP, 2009.

Wackernagel J. Vorlesungen über Syntax, mit besonderer Berücksichtigung von Griechisch, Lateinisch und Deutsch. Bd. I–II. Basel, Birkhäuser, 1926–1928.

Willi A. The Languages of Aristophanes: Aspects of Variation in Classical Greek. Oxford, OUP, 2003.

Wilson N. (ed.) Herodoti Historiae. T. I–II. Oxford, Clarendon Press, 2015.

Wyatt W. F. Homeric Hiatus. Glotta 1992, 70 (1/2), 20–30.

Downloads

Published

2022-08-06

How to Cite

Kazanskaya, M. N. (2022). ἀνά τε ἔδραμεν: Explaining the Longevity of the Tmesis. Philologia Classica, 17(1), 48–59. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu20.2022.104

Issue

Vol. 17 No. 1 (2022)

Section

Graecia antiqua

License

Articles of "Philologia Classica" are open access distributed under the terms of the License Agreement with Saint Petersburg State University, which permits to the authors unrestricted distribution and self-archiving free of charge.