Per il testo degli scritti filosofici di Apuleio
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21638/11701/spbu20.2019.212Abstract
The aim of this paper is to cast new light on the textual constitution of some passages of Apuleius’ Opuscula philosophica. A new edition of this text has been recently published by G. Magnaldi for the Scriptorum classicorum bibliotheca Oxoniensis (2019). In the present paper I discuss about 40 passages, for the most of which I propose a new conjecture (my knowledge of the readings of the manuscripts is based only on the reports of the existent editions). For istance: De deo S.3, 9 instead of disputatione read depravatione; De deo S.13, 4 sed differunt ab his passione should be deleted; De Plat. 1, 3, 6 ad should be deleted; De Plat. 1, 15, 4 add ne <ocius> esculenta; De Plat. 1, 16, 1 instead of ad celeritatem facilius se movendi read ad facilitatem celerius se movendi; De Plat. 2, 12, 1 extraria should be deleted; De Plat. 2, 22, 7 read adflictatio eo quod, si; De mu. 10, 2 read est <ventus> nisi; De mu. 13, 4 add vero <vocant> ἀπό; De mu. 17, 7 read inferiores quo<s>que; De mu. 23, 3 read torrentium viscerum; De mu. 25, 1 add et <propterea> poetarum; De mu. 38, 3 instead of suadeat read praesideat.
Keywords:
Apuleius, ancient philosophy, textual criticism, conjectures
Downloads
References
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Articles of "Philologia Classica" are open access distributed under the terms of the License Agreement with Saint Petersburg State University, which permits to the authors unrestricted distribution and self-archiving free of charge.