Der Durst des Hercules: Kallimachos, Augustus und die Liebeselegie in Properz 4, 9
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21638/11701/spbu20.2018.106Abstract
This article interprets the thirsty Hercules of Propertius 4.9 as a mixture of a proto-Augustan figure, an elegiac lover, and a Callimachean poet. It argues that this image can be read as a metapoetic symbol of the transformation of Roman elegy from an erotic into a political genre, which Propertius enacts in his entire poetic oeuvre. The article begins by drawing attention to the fact that, by analogy with Virgil’s treatment of the Heracles-Cacus-episode in Aeneid 8, the poem ends like a cletic hymn, which, curiously enough, urges Hercules not to appear in a cultic context but ‘to be present in my book’ (Prop. 4.9.72 libro … inesse meo). It then analyzes parallels between the Hercules narrative of 4.9 and the overall poetic trajectory of Propertius 1-4, drawing particular attention to the portrayal of Cynthia as a notional synonym of Propertius’ erotic elegy in Books 1-3 and to the gradual emergence of Augustus’ infinitely expanding empire as a preferred object of an eroticized longing, which becomes fully apparent in Book 4. Finally, it shows that the poem’s allusions to Callimachus’ Hymns (the Bath of Pallas, the Hymn to Zeus, and the Hymn to Apollo) constitute the core of its metapoetic meaning, and argues that Propertius’ version of ‘Callimachean poetics’ consists in staging a transformation of the elegiac desire for the unattainable into an act of heroic / imperial conquest.
Keywords:
Propertius, Roman elegy, Callimachus, symbolic images
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
References
Ancona R. — Greene E. (Hrg.) Gendered Dynamics in Latin Love Poetry. Baltimore, Johns Hopkins University Press, 2005.
Andersen W. S. “Hercules exclusus: Propertius 4.9.” AJP 1964, 85, 1–12.
Asper M. Onomata Allotria: Zur Genese, Struktur und Funktion poetologischer Metaphern bei Kallimachos. Stuttgart, Steiner, 1997.
Bellen H. “Adventus dei: Der Gegenwartsbezug in Vergils Darstellung der Geschichte von Cacus und Hercules (Aen. 8.184-275).” RhM 1963,106, 23–30.
Berry M. “Political Poetics: The Bona Dea Episode in Propertius 4.9.” Latomus 2011, 70, 391–404.
Binder G. Aeneas und Augustus: Interpretationen zum 8. Buch der Aeneis. Meisenheim am Glan, Hain, 1971.
Cairns F. “Propertius and the Battle of Actium (4.6).” In: Woodman, A. J (Hrg.) Poetry and Politics in the Age of Augustus. Cambridge Cambridge University Press, 1984, 229–236.
Cairns F. “Propertius 4.9: ‘Hercules exclusus’ and the Dimensions of Genre.” In: K. Galinsky (Hrg.) The Interpretation of Roman Poetry. Frankfurt am Main, Lang, 1992, 65–95.
Cairns F. Sextus Propertius: The Augustan Elegist. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2006.
Caston R. R. The Elegiac Passion: Jealousy in Roman Love Elegy. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2012.
Coutelle É. Poétique et métapoésie chez Properce: de l’ars amandi à l’ars scribendi. Louvain, Peeters, 2005.
DeBrohun J.B. Roman Propertius and the Reinvention of Elegy. Ann Arbor, University of Michigan Press, 2003.
Effe B. “Hercules fervidus ira: Ein Motiv der Aeneis und seine Rezeption bei Properz und Ovid.” Hermes 2002, 130, 164–175.
Fabre-Serris J. “Élégie érotique et discours satirique. Sur trois experimentations propertiennes: les élégies 4.7, 4.8, 4.9.“ MD 2011, 67, 51–77.
Fear T. “Propertian Closure: The Elegiac Inscription of the Liminal Male and Ideological Contestation in Augustan Rome.” In: Ancona — Greene 2005, 13–40.
Fedeli P. “Ideologia augustea e poesia: Il mito di Ercole e Caco in Properzio.” In: Rosen, K. (Hrg.) Macht und Kultur im Rom der Kaiserzeit. Bonn, Bouvier, 1994, 109–119.
Fedeli P. “L’inno ad Ercole nella chiusa di Prop. 4.9.” Seleno 2012, 38, 273–281.
Freudenburg K. “Recusatio as Political Theatre: Horace’s Letter to Augustus.” JRS 2014, 104, 105–132.
Furley W. D. “Praise and Persuasion in Greek Hymns.” JHS 1995, 115, 29–46.
Galinsky K. “The Hercules — Cacus Episode in Aeneid VIII. ” AJP 1966, 86, 18–51.
Gardner H. H. Gendering Time in Augustan Love Poetry. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2013.
Greene E. The Erotics of Domination: Male Desire and the Mistress in Latin Love Poetry. Baltimore, Johns Hopkins University Press, 1998.
Greene E. “Gender Identity and the Elegiac Hero in Propertius 2.1.” In: Ancona — Greene 2005, 61–77.
Harrison S. J. “Hercules and Augustus in Propertius 4.9.” PLLS 2005, 12, 117–131.
Heyworth S. J. Cynthia: A Companion to the Text of Propertius. New York, Oxford University Press, 2007.
Holzberg N. “Der ‘Böse’ und die Augusteer: Cacus bei Livius, Vergil, Properz und Ovid.” Gymnasium 2012, 119, 449–462.
Hunter R. The Shadow of Callimachus: Studies in Reception of Hellenistic Poetry in Rome. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2006.
Hutchinson G. Propertius. Elegies. Book IV. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2006.
James Sh. L. Learned Girls and Male Persuasion: Gender and Reading in Roman Love Elegy. Berkeley, University of California Press, 2003.
Janan M. W. The Politics of Desire: Propertius, IV. Berkeley, University of California Press, 2001.
Keith A. Propertius: Poet of Love and Leisure. London, Duckworth, 2008.
Kennedy D. The Arts of Love: Five Essays in the Discourse of Roman Love Elegy. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1993.
Kierdorf W. “Properzens Actium-Elegie (4.6): Künstlerische Bewältigung einer politischen Annäherung.” In: Binder, G. — Effe, B. (Hrg.) Affirmation und Kritik: Zur politischen Funktion von Kunst und Literatur im Altertum. Trier, Wissenschaftlicher Verlag Trier, 1995, 165–184.
Kirichenko A. “Virgil’s Augustan Temples: Image and Intertext in the Aeneid.“ JRS 2013, 103, 65–87.
Kirichenko A. “Conviva satur: Mündlichkeit, Schriftlichkeit und Patronage in den sermones des Horaz.” Poetica 2016, 48, 201–240.
Kirichenko A. “Callimachus Romanus: Propertius’ Love Elegy and the Aetiology of Empire.” Erscheint in: Klooster, J.— Wessels A.(Hrg.) Inventing Origins: The Function of Aetiology in Antiquity. London, Routledge.
Lindheim S. H. “Hercules Cross-Dressed, Hercules Undressed: Unmasking the Construction of the Propertian amator in Elegy 4.9.” AJP 1998, 119, 43–66.
Liveley J. “Cynthia prima fuit, Cynthia finis erit: Time and Narrative in Propertius 4.” Helios 2010, 37, 111– 127.
Miller J. F. “Callimachus and the Augustan Aetiological Elegy.” ANRW 1982, II 30.1, 371–417.
Miller J. F. Apollo, Augustus, and the Poets. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2009.
Miller P. A. Subjecting Verses: Latin Love Poetry and the Emergence of the Real. Princeton, Princeton University Press, 2004.
Möller M. “Phantastische(s) Dichte(n). Eine kleine Semiotik des Properz (c. 4.8).” Poetica 2007, 39, 263–284.
Morgan L. “Assimilation and Civil War: Hercules and Cacus. Aeneid 8.” In: Stahl, H.-P. (Hrg.) Vergil’s Aeneid: Augustan Epic and Political Context. London, Duckworth, 1998, 175–197.
Mutschler F.-H. “Hercules im Hain: Überlegungen zur Properzelegie 4.9.” In: Faber, R.— Seidensticker, B.(Hrg.) Worte, Bilder, Töne: Studien zur Antike und Antikenrezeption. Würzburg, Königshausen & Neumann, 1996, 115–128.
O’Neill K. “The Lover’s Gaze and Cynthia’s Glance.” In: Ancona — Greene 2005, 243–268.
Panoussi V. “Spining Hercules: Gender, Religion, and Geography in Propertius 4.9.” CW 2016, 109, 179–194.
Papanghelis Th. D. Propertius: A Hellenistic Poet on Love and Death. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2009.
Pinotti P. “Properzio IV.9: Alessandrinismo e arte allusiva.” Giornale Italiano di Filologia 1977, 29, 50–71.
Scioli E. Dream, Fantasy, and Visual Art in Roman Elegy. Madison, University of Wisconsin Press, 2015.
Stahl H.-P. Propertius’ Love and War: Individual and State under Augustus. Berkeley, University of California Press, 1985.
Stephens S. Callimachus: The Hymns. New York, Oxford University Press, 2015.
Tueller M. A. “Well-Read Heroes: Quoting the Aetia in Aeneid 8.” HSCP 2000, 100, 361–380.
Wallis J. “Reading False Closure in(to) Propertian Elegy.” In: Grewing, F. — Acosta-Hughes, B. — Kirichenko, A. (Hrg.) The Door Ajar: False Closure in Greek and Roman Literature and Art. Heidelberg, Winter, 2013, 229–246.
Welch T. The Elegiac Cityscape: Propertius and the Meaning of Roman Monuments. Columbus, Ohio State University Press, 2005.
Wimmel W. Kallimachos in Rom: Die Nachfolge seines apologetischen Dichtens in der Augusteerzeit. Wiesbaden, Steiner, 1960.
Wyke M. “The Elegiac Woman at Rome.” PCPS 1987a, 33, 153–187.
Wyke M. “Written Women: Propertius’ scripta puella.” JRS 1987b, 77, 47–61.
Wyke M. “Mistress and Metaphor in Augustan Elegy.” Helios 1989, 16, 25–47.
Wyke M. “Taking the Woman’s Part: Engendering Roman Love Elegy.” Ramus 1994, 23, 110–128.
Zetzel J. “Poetic Baldness and Its Cure.” MD 1996, 36, 73–100.
Downloads
Published
2018-06-27
How to Cite
Kirichenko, A. (2018). Der Durst des Hercules: Kallimachos, Augustus und die Liebeselegie in Properz 4, 9. Philologia Classica, 13(1), 82–95. https://doi.org/10.21638/11701/spbu20.2018.106
Issue
Section
Orbis Romanus
License
Articles of "Philologia Classica" are open access distributed under the terms of the License Agreement with Saint Petersburg State University, which permits to the authors unrestricted distribution and self-archiving free of charge.
