Interruptions in Roman Comedy: Gender, Status, and Power in Interaction

  • Łukasz Berger Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań, ul. Fredry 10, 61-701 Poznań, Poland

Аннотация

The article addresses the pragmatic and sociolinguistic constraints of interrupting in Roman comedy. It starts with a redefinition of the phenomenon informed by the methods of Conversation Analysis (CA): apart from syntactically incomplete utterances (as a result of interruptions by others), the analysis also includes the cases of interruptions reported by the characters. Furthermore, a distinction is made between intrusive (disaligning) interventions and other forms of competitive turn encroachments. The term ‘interruptions’, however, has been reserved only for the former, antagonistic type which serves to express disagreement and disinterest or to usurp the speaking turn. Using the revised criteria, the article proceeds to comment on quantitative data extracted from all the extant plays by Plautus and Terence. Accordingly, interruptions are viewed in relation to gender, age and status of the speakers, whereas some more detailed analysis concerns male and female citizens, prostitutes and servants. After comparing every character’s share of talk with their proportional use of turn incursions (both collaborative and disruptive), it is argued that the violation of the turn-exchange system is significantly associated with some interlocutors and less so with others. The last section presents interrupting as a pragmatic means of exerting power in interaction while discussing the phenomenon also from a (sociolinguistic) cross-gender perspective.

Ключевые слова:

interruption, gender, social status, Plautus, Terence, Conversation Analysis, turn taking, male speech, female speech

Скачивания

Данные скачивания пока недоступны.
 

Литература

Adams J. N. Female speech in Latin comedy. Antichthon 1984, 18, 43–77.

Barrios-Lech P. Linguistic Interaction in Roman Comedy. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2016.

Barsby J. (ed.) Terence. Comedies. Vol. 1–2. Cambridge MA, HUP, 2001.

Bennet A. Interruptions and the interpretation of conversation, in: D. Perlmutter et al. (eds). Proceedings of the 4th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society. Berkeley, University of California, 1978, 557–75.

Berger Ł. Forms of talk in Roman Comedy. Reading Plautus and Terence with Goffman and Conversation Analysts. Dionysus ex machina 2020a, 11, 137–167.

Berger Ł. Turn taking and power relations in Plautus’ Casina. Graeco-Latina Brunensia 2020b, 25 (1), 19–35.

Berger Ł. Im/Politeness of Interruptions in Roman Comedy, in: L. Unceta and Ł. Berger (eds). Politeness in Greek and Latin. Cambridge University Press (forthcoming).

Bilmes J. Being interrupted. Language in Society 1997, 26 (4), 507–31.

Braund S. M. Marriage, adultery, and divorce in Roman comic drama, in: W. S. Smith (ed.) Satiric Advice on Women and Marriage: From Plautus to Chaucer. University of Michigan Press 2005, 39–70.

James D., Clarke S. Women, men, and interruptions: A critical review, in: D. Tannen (ed.) Gender and Conversational Interaction. Oxford — New York, Oxford University Press, 1993, 231–280.

De Melo W. (ed.). Plautus. Comedies. Vol. 1–5. Cambridge, MA, HUP, 2011–2013.

Dutsch D. M. Feminine Discourse in Roman Comedy: On Echoes and Voices. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2008.

Edelsky C. Who’s got the floor? Language in society 1981, 10 (3), 383–421.

Fantham E. Women in control, in: D. Dutsch, S. L. James, D. Konstan (ed.) Women in Roman Republican Drama. Madison, WI, University of Wisconsin Press, 2015, 91–107.

Feltovich A. In Defense of Myrrhina: Friendship between Women in Plautus’s Casina. Helios 2015(a), 42 (2), 245–266.

Feltovich A. The Many Shapes of Sisterhood in Roman Comedy, in: D. Dutsch, S. L. James, D. Konstan (ed.) Women in Roman Republican Drama. Madison, WI, University of Wisconsin Press, 2015(b), 128–154.

Goldberg J. A. Interrupting the discourse on interruptions: An analysis in terms of relationally neutral, power-and rapport-oriented acts. Journal of Pragmatics 1990, 14 (6), 883–903.

González Vázquez C. La matrona plautina desde la ‘realidad’ teatral, in: F. De Martino, C. Morenilla (ed.) Teatro y sociedad en la antigüedad clásica. El logos femenino en el teatro. Bari, Levante Editori, 2012, 115–150.

Heritage J., Stivers T. Conversation Analysis and Sociology. The handbook of conversation analysis, in: J. Sidnell and T. Stivers (eds). The Handbook of Conversation Analysis. Malden — Oxford, Wiley-Blackwell, 2013, 659–673.

Herman V. Dramatic Discourse: Dialogue as Interaction in Plays. London — New York, Routledge, 1995.

Hofmann J. B. La lingua d’uso latina (transl. L. Ricottilli). Bologna, Pàtron, 1980.

Hutchby I. Confrontation talk: Aspects of ‘interruption’ in argument sequences on talk radio. Text-Interdisciplinary Journal for the Study of Discourse 1992, 12 (3), 343–372.

Hutchby I. Participants’ orientations to interruptions, rudeness and other impolite acts in talk-in-interaction. Journal of Politeness Research 2008, 4, 221–241.

James S. L. Gender and sexuality in Terence, in: A. Augoustakis, A. Traill (ed.) A Companion to Terence. Malden, MA, Wiley-Blackwell 2013, 175–94.

James S. L. Mater, oratio, filia: Listening to mothers in Roman comedy, in: D. Dutsch, S. L. James and D. Konstan (ed.) Women in Roman Republican Drama. Madison, WI, University of Wisconsin Press, 2015, 108–127.

Kruschwitz P. Language, sex, and (lack of) power: Reassessing the linguistic discourse about female speech in Latin sources. Athenaeum 2012, 100, 197-229.

Li H. Z. Cooperative and intrusive interruptions in inter-and intracultural dyadic discourse. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 2001, 20 (3), 259–84.

Lycan W. G. Conversation, politeness, and interruption. Paper in Linguistics 1977, 10 (1–2), 23–53.

Martin R. H. A Not-so-Minor Character in Terence’s Eunuchus. Classical Philology 1995, 90(2), 139–151.

McCarthy K. Slaves, Masters, and the Art of Authority in Plautine Comedy. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2000.

Minchin E. Homeric Voices: Discourse, Memory, Gender. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2007.

Müller R. Sprechen und Sprache. Dialoglinguistische Studien zu Terenz. Heidelberg, Universitätsverlag Winter, 1997.

Murata K. Intrusive or co-operative? A cross-cultural study of interruption. Journal of Pragmatics 1994, 21 (4), 385–400.

Packman Z. M. Family and household in the comedies of Terence, in: A. Augoustakis, A. Traill (eds). A Companion to Terence. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell, 2013, 195–210.

Schegloff E. A. Accounts of conduct in interaction: Interruption, overlap, and turn-taking, in: J. H. Turner (ed.) Handbook of Sociological Theory. New York, Springer, 2002, 287–321.

Schegloff E. A. Sequence Organization in Interaction. Cambridge. Cambridge University Press, 2007.

Smith D. L. The Rhetoric of Interruption: Speech-Making, Turn-Taking, and Rule-Breaking in Luke-Acts and Ancient Greek Narrative. Berlin — Boston, De Gruyter, 2012.

Starks Jr J. H. Opera in bello, in otio, in negotio: Terence and Rome in the 160s BCE, in: A. Augoustakis, A. Traill (eds). A Companion to Terence. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell, 2013, 132–55.

Stewart R. Plautus and Roman Slavery. Malden — Oxford, Wiley-Blackwell, 2012.

Tannen D. Gender and Discourse. Oxford — New York, Oxford University Press, 1994.

Unceta Gómez L. The Politics of Manipulation: Politeness and Insincerity in the Language of Parasites and Courtesans in Plautus’ Comedies, in: G. Martin et al. (ed.) Pragmatic Approaches to Drama. Studies in Communication on the Ancient Stage. Leiden-Boston, Brill, 2020, 291–316.

Walker J. A commentary on Plautus’ ‘Aulularia’. PhD dissertation, the University of St Andrews, 2005. Available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10023/14536 (17.04.2021).

Williams G. Some aspects of Roman marriage ceremonies and ideals. The Journal of Roman Studies 1958, 48 (1/2), 16–29.

Witzke S. S. Gender and Sexuality in Plautus, in: D. Dutsch and G. F. Franko (eds). A Companion to Plautus. Wiley-Blackwell 2020, 331–346.

Опубликован
2021-07-28
Как цитировать
Berger, Łukasz. (2021). Interruptions in Roman Comedy: Gender, Status, and Power in Interaction. Philologia Classica, 16(1), 57-76. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu20.2021.106
Раздел
Orbis Romanus