Were Homeric Glosses Part of School Education in Fifth-century Athens? New Interpretation of Aristophanes’ Daitales fr. 233

Authors

  • Elena Yu. Chepel A. M. Gorky Institute of World Literature of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 25a, Povarskaya ul., Moscow, 121069, Russian Federation

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu20.2022.204

Abstract

The article revisits Aristophanes’ Daitales fr. 233 which is often taken as (the only) evidence of Homeric glosses being drilled by Athenian youth as part of their school education in 5th c. BC. The author discusses in detail the context of Aristophanic citation in Galen’s work, the state of the text of the fragment and its modern interpretations. In fact, nothing in the text itself directly suggests that learning glosses was part of the traditional school education in Athens. On the contrary, it can be argued that Aristophanes presented glosses as linguistic innovations and intellectuals studying them as sophists. The parallels between Daitales and Clouds, as well as Plato’s Kratylos and other fifth-century texts must be taken into account when interpretingthe dialogue between the Father and his Son in fr. 233. As a conclusion, the author suggests that the characters of Daitales should be interpreted differently: the Old Man in this episode of the play is not opposing the sophistic teachings, but rather using these in his argument as an instrument to demonstrate the Licentious Son his ignorance. The latter is apparently not a follower of the sophists and defends himself with his more practical knowledge of legal terms.

Keywords:

Aristophanes’ Daitales, school education, glosses, sophists, ancient linguistic theories

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
 

References

Barney R. Names and nature in Plato’s Cratylus. Studies in philosophy. New York — London, Routledge, 2001.

Bergk T. Aristophanis fragmenta. Berlin, Reimer, 1840.

Boudon-Millot V., Jouanna J., Pietrobelli A. (eds) Galien. Ne pas se chagriner. Paris, Les Belles Lettres, 2010.

Cassio A. C. (ed., comm.) Aristofane, Banchettanti (Daitales): i frammenti. Pisa, Giardini, 1977.

Coker A. Galen and the Language of Old Comedy: Glimpses of a Lost Treatise at Ind. 23b–28, in: C. Petit (ed.) Galen’s Treatise Περὶ Ἀλυπίας (De indolentia) in Context: A Tale of Resilience. Leiden, Brill, 2019, 63–90.

Dindorf G. Aristophanis fragmenta. Leipzig, Libraria Weidmannia, 1829.

Dindorf G. Poetarum scenicorum graecorum… fabulae superstites et perditarum fragmenta. Leipzig, Teubner, 1869.

Dobree, see Scholefield Dover 1968: K. J. Dover, Aristophanes’ Clouds (Oxford).

Dunbar N. Aristophanes’ Birds. Oxford, OUP, 1998.

Fritzsche F. De Daetalensibus Aristophanis commentatio. Leipzig, Lehnhold, 1831.

Grintser N. The Birth of European Linguistic Theory: The Idea of Language in the Sophists, in: T. Li, K. Dyer (eds) From Ancient Manuscripts to Modern Dictionaries: Select Studies in Aramaic, Hebrew, and Greek. Piscataway, NJ, 2017, 365–378.

Guéraud O., Jouguet P. Un livre d’écolier du IIIe siécle avant J.-C. Cairo, Société Royale Égyptienne de Papyrologie, 1938.

Hanson A. E. Galen: author and critic, in: G. Most (ed.) Editing texts — Texte edieren. Göttingen, Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1998, 22–53.

Kaibel G. Comicorum Graecorum Fragmenta. Berlin, Weidmann, 1899.

Kerferd G. B. The Sophistic Movement. Cambridge, CUP, 1981.

Kühn K. G. (ed.) Claudii Galeni Opera omnia. Lipsiae, Car. Cnoblochii, 1821–1833.

Manetti D. Galen and Hippocratic medicine: language and practice, in: C. Gill, T. Whitmarsh, J. Wilkins (eds) Galen and the world of knowledge. Cambridge, CUP, 2009, 157–174.

Novokhatko A. Discourse markers in a comic fragmentary dialogue, in: F. Logozzo, P. Poccetti (eds) Ancient Greek Linguistics: New Approaches, Insights, Perspectives. Berlin — Boston, De Gruyter, 2017, 227–242.

Novokhatko A. The Origins and Growth of Scholarship in Pre-Hellenistic Greece, in: F. Montanari (ed.) History of Ancient Greek Scholarship. From the Beginnings to the End of the Byzantine Age. Leiden — Boston, Brill, 2020, 9–131.

Novokhatko A. Homeric Hermeneutics on the way from Athens to Alexandria, in: A. Rengakos, P. Finglass, B. Zimmermann (eds) More than Homer Knew — Studies on Homer and His Ancient Commentators. Berlin — Boston, De Gruyter, 2020, 87–171.

Olson S. D. (comm.) Eupolis. Testimonia and Aiges — Dêmoi (frr. 1–146). Translation and Commentary. Heidelberg, Verlag Antike, 2017.

Olson S. D. (comm.) Aristophanes’ Clouds: A Commentary. Ann Arbor, University of Michigan Press, 2021.

Perilli L. Galeni vocum Hippocratis Glossarium / Galeno, Interpretazione delle parole difficili di Ippocrate. Testo, Traduzione e Note di Commento. Berlin — Boston, De Gruyter, 2017.

Pfeiffer R. History of classical scholarship: from the beginnings to the end of the Hellenistic age. Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1968.

Pritchard D. M. Athens, in: W. M. Bloomer (ed.) A Companion to Ancient Education. Chichester, Wiley-Blackwell, 2015, 112–122.

Revermann 2013: M. Revermann M. Paraepic comedy: point(s) and practices, in: E. L. Prauscello, M. Telò (eds) Comic Interactions: Comedy and Other Genres. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2013, 101–128.

Richardson N. J. Homeric professors in the age of the Sophists. Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society 1975, 21, 65–81.

Scholefield J. (ed.) Dobree Petri Pauli Advresaria II. Cambridge, 1843.

Sedley D. Plato’s Cratylus. New York, Cambridge University Press, 2003.

Seidler A. Brevis disputatio de Aristophanis fragmentis. Halle, Paxonum, 1818.

Willi A. The languages of Aristophanes. Aspects of Linguistic variation in classical Attic Greek. Oxford, OUP, 2003.

Wolfsdorf D. Sophistic Method and Practice, in: W. M. Bloomer (ed.) A Companion to Ancient Education. Chichester, Wiley-Blackwell, 2015, 63–76.

Downloads

Published

2022-12-30

How to Cite

Chepel, E. Y. . (2022). Were Homeric Glosses Part of School Education in Fifth-century Athens? New Interpretation of Aristophanes’ Daitales fr. 233. Philologia Classica, 17(2), 244–252. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu20.2022.204

Issue

Section

Graecia antiqua