Textual Notes on the Passio Nazarii, Celsi, Geruasii et Protasii (BHL 6043)

Авторы

  • Mikhail Shumilin A. M. Gorky Institute of World Literature of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 25a, ul. Povarskaya, Moscow, 121069, Russian Federation The Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration, 82, pr. Vernadskogo, Moscow, 119571, Russian Federation

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu20.2022.109

Аннотация

In her critical edition of the Passio Nazarii, Celsi, Geruasii et Protasii (BHL 6043), a text dated to the 6th or 7th century AD and probably translated from Greek, Cecile Lanéry introduces several conjectural changes aimed at language standardization. The author of the present article takes issue with several of her conjectures and suggests that in each case the transmitted text actually stands criticism and should probably be left unchanged. At 2.3, the transmitted alapas is not to be changed to alapis with percutio, since percutio with both the accusative of direct object and the accusative of a word meaning “blow” is several times reliably attested in the Vetus Latina, and in one of these instances the word used for “blow” is actually alapa. At 5.1, et in the expression uocans Nazarium et dixit ei should not be deleted, since there are numerous parallels for this syntax in Late Latin. At 8.2, in carcerem is to be retained as a possible way to describe position in Late Latin, whether confusion of expressions denoting position and direction or hypercorrect graphic -m is at issue. At 12.1, the form imperatori is to be retained as a possible orthographic variant for the ablative in Late Latin.

Ключевые слова:

textual criticism, hagiography, Late Latin, passiones, case government, apodotic et, orthography

Скачивания

Данные скачивания пока недоступны.
 

Библиографические ссылки

Adams J. N. Social Variation and the Latin Language. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2013.

Blatt F. Die lateinischen Bearbeitungen der Acta Andreae et Matthiae apud anthropophagos. Gießen, Alfred Töpelmann, 1930.

Coleman R. Vulgarism and Normalization in the Text of Regula Sancti Benedicti, in: H. Petersmann, R. Kettemann (eds) Latin vulgaire — latin tardif V. Heidelberg, 1999, 345–356.

Döhler M. Acta Petri: Text, Übersetzung und Kommentar zu den Actus Vercellensis. Berlin — Boston, de Gruyter, 2018.

Galdi G. Some Considerations on the Apodotic Uses of atque and et (2nd c. BC — 2nd c. AD). Journal of Latin Linguistics 13, 2014, 63–91.

Gryson R. Altlateinische Handschriften = Manuscrits vieux latins, Partie 1. Vetus Latina 1/2A; Freiburg, Herder, 1999.

Herman J. Vulgar Latin. University Park, The Pennsylvania State University Press, 2000.

Houghton H. A. G. The Latin New Testament: A Guide to its Early History, Texts, and Manuscripts. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2016.

Krusch B. Fredegarii et aliorum Chronica; Vitae Sanctorum. Hannover, Hahn, 1888.

Lanéry C. Le dossier des saints Nazaire, Celse, Gervais et Protais. Édition de la Passion BHL 6043 (= 3516). AB 2010a, 128, 241–280.

Lanéry C. Hagiographie d’Italie (300–550). I. Les passions latines composées en Italie, in G. Philippart (ed.) Hagiographies, Vol. V. Turnhout, 2010b, 15–369.

Lapidge M. The Roman Martyrs: Introduction, Translations, and Commentary. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2018.

Lowe E. A. Codices Latini antiquiores: A Palaeographical Guide to Latin Manuscripts Prior to the Ninth Century. Part 4. Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1947.

Önnerfors A. Zur Vermischung der Ausdrücke für Ortsruhe und Bewegung im Lateinischen. Eranos 53, 1955, 148–164.

Prieur J.-M. Acta Andreae. Turnhout, Brepols, 1989.

Stotz P. Handbuch zur lateinischen Sprache des Mittelalters. Bd. 3: Lautlehre. Munich, C. H. Beck, 1996.

Väänänen V. Introduction au latin vulgaire. Paris, Klincksiesk, 1981.

Wehr B. Diskurs-Strategien im Romanischen. Tübingen, Gunter Narr, 1984.

Wehr B. Spätlatein aus der Sicht der Romanistik: zu apodosis-einleitendem et, in: R. Wright (ed.) Latin vulgaire — latin tardif VIII. Hildesheim — Zürich — New York, 2008, 179–190.

Zanetti U. Les passions grecques de S. Nazaire. AB 1987, 105, 303–384.

Zwierlein O. Petrus in Rom. Die literarischen Zeugnisse: Mit einer kritischen Edition der Martyrien des Petrus und Paulus auf neuer handschriftlicher Auflage. Berlin — New York, de Gruyter, 2009.

Загрузки

Опубликован

06.08.2022

Как цитировать

Shumilin, M. (2022). Textual Notes on the Passio Nazarii, Celsi, Geruasii et Protasii (BHL 6043). Philologia Classica, 17(1), 107–112. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu20.2022.109

Выпуск

Раздел

Latinitas media et nova