When the Poetics of Aristotle was actually written?

Authors

  • Mikhail M. Pozdnev St. Petersburg State University

Abstract

The chronology of the Aristotelian works fails to be supported by their proximity to or hostility towards Plato’s philosophy. In fact, only two means of maintaining the chronological order are reliable, i. e. the cross-references (provided they are authentic) and the historical data mentioned. The notorious question of different chronological strata underlying Aristotelian treatises we try to put aside admitting that, although he may have worked lifelong on the similar topics, the remaining versions are most close to publishable. The final author’s revision of a given work should thus be considered as

its actual creation. The cross references necessarily bring to the conclusion that the Poetics was created after the Politics and before the Rhetoric: the famous catharsis reference in the Politics is in future tense (which also seems to prove its authenticity); all six Rhetoric references are retrospective; the Poetics reference in ch. XIX, 1456 a 33: τὰ μὲν οὖν περὶ τὴν διάνοιαν ἐν τοῖς περὶ ῤητορικῆς κείσθω is either prospective or non-Aristotelian (παρείσθω 1456 b 19, is definitely late and the other references to the Rhetoric elsewhere are missing; for additional evidence concerning relative chronology cf. Poet. 1454 b 17–18 and 1460 b 13–1). Th e absolute chronology comfortably coincides with this: the Politics displays expectations pertaining to Alexander’s reforms and conquests, and to prove that Rhetoric is late one only has to trace the dramatic political events of the early 30-ies hinted at. The Poetics is poor in external evidence of that kind. However, the high esteem of Theodectes and the absence of recommendations regarding satyrs as well as trilogies point at the second Athenian period оf Aristotle. The philosopher could have derived inspiration from the impressive theatrical reform program of Lycurgus (reconstruction of the theatre of Dionysus, the edition of the three great tragedians). He may have even been involved in it and most certainly cherished hopes of reviving the art of tragedy which he saw in decline. Th e position of Düring, Burkert and others who argue that the Poetics and the Rhetoric (or their basic strata) were completed by Aristotle in the years of Academy should be abandoned. The early date of the Poetics tells nothing new about it, whereas the late date is not only better supported by the evidence, but also explains one of the most puzzling features of this treatise, that is, its prescriptive character.

Keywords:

Aristotle, Poetics, Rhetoric

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Литература

1. Доватур А. И. Политика и Политии Аристотеля. М.; Л.: Наука, 1965. 393 с.

2. Доватур А. И. «Политика» Аристотеля // Аристотель. Собрание сочинений в 4-х т. М.: Мысль, 1983. Т. 4. 830 с.

3. Позднев М. Психология искусства: учение Аристотеля. СПб.; М.: Русский фонд содействия образованию и науке, 2010.

4. Aristotle. On the Art of Poetry / a revised text with critical intr., transl. and comm. by I. Bywater. Oxford, 1909. XLVII, 387 p.

5. Aristotle. Poetics / ed. and transl. by S. Halliwell. London: Harvard University Press, 1995. 533 p.

6. Aristotle. Poetics / ed. with intr. and comm. by D. W. Lucas. Oxford: Clarendon Press; New York: Oxford University Press, 1968. XXVIII, 313 p.

7. Aristoteles. Politik / Übers. und mit einer Einl. sowie Anm. hrsg. von E. Schütrumpf. Hamburg: Meiner, 2012. LXVI, 354 c.

8. Aristoteles. Rhetorik / Übers. und erläutert von Chr. Rapp. 1. Hb. Berlin: Akademie Verlag, 2002. 1007 S.

9. Bonitz H., Index Aristotelicus. Berlin: Reimer, 1870. 878 p.

10. Burkert W. Aristoteles im Th eater. Zur Datierung des 3. Buches der “Rhetoric” und der “Poetic” // Museum Helveticum. Bd. 32. 1975. S. 67–72.

11. Düring I. Aristoteles: Darstellung und Interpetation seines Denkens. 2e Aufl ., Nachdruck der Ausg. von 1966. Heidelberg: Winter, 2005. XV, 670 p.

12. Else G. F. The Structure and Date of Book 10 of Plato’s Republic. Heidelberg: Winter, 1972. 74 S.

13. Else G. F. Plato and Aristotle on Poetry. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press; London, 1986. XXI, 221 p.

14. Flashar H. Aristoteles und Brecht // Poetica. № 6. 1974. S. 36.

15. Jaeger W. Studien zur Entstehungsgeschichte der Metaphysik des Aristoteles. Berlin, 1912. S. 131–148.

16. Jaeger W. Aristoteles. Grundlegung einer Geschichte seiner Entwicklung. Berlin: Weidmann, 1923. 438 S.

17. Halliwell S. Aristotle’s Poetics. London: Duckworth, 1986. XI, 69 p.

18. Moraux P. Les Listes Anciennes des Ouvrages d’Aristote. Louvain: Éditions Universitaires, 1951. X, 391 p.

19. Solmsen F. Th eodectes // Realencyclopädie. Bd. VA-10. 1934. S. 1726–1727.

20. Susemihl F. Kleine Beiträge zur Geschichte der griechischen Tragödie // Rheinisches Museum. Bd. 54. 1899. S. 473–476.

21. Thielscher P. Die relative Chronologie der erhaltenen Schrift en des Aristoteles nach den bestimmten Selbstzitaten // Philologus. 1948. Bd. 97. S. 229–265.

22. Vahlen J. Beiträge zu Aristoteles’ Poetik. Teil III. Wien: Gerold in Komm., 1867. S. 213–439.

References

1. Dovatur A.I. Politika i Politii Aristotelia [Aristotle’s Politics and Politeia]. Moscow; Leningrad, Nauka Publ., 1965. 393 s.

2. Dovatur A.I. “Politika” Aristotelia. [Aristotle’s Politics] Aristotel’. Sobranie sochinenii v 4-kh t. [Aristotle: Collected Works, in 4 volumes]. Moscow, Mysl’ Publ., 1983. T. 4. 830 s.

3. Pozdnev M. Psikhologiia iskusstva: uchenie Aristotelia [Psychology of Art: Aristotle’s Th ought]. Saint Petersburg; Moscow, Russkii fond sodeistviia obrazovaniiu i nauke, 2010. 816 s.

4. Aristotle. On the Art of Poetry, a revised text with critical intr., transl. and comm. by I. Bywater. Oxford, 1909. XLVII, 387 p.

5. Aristotle. Poetics, ed. and transl. by S. Halliwell. London, Harvard University Press, 1995. 533 p.

6. Aristotle. Poetics, ed. with intr. and comm. by D.W. Lucas. Oxford, Clarendon Press; New York, Oxford University Press, 1968. XXVIII, 313 p.

7. Aristoteles. Politik. Übers. und mit einer Einl. sowie Anm. hrsg. von E. Schütrumpf. Hamburg, Meiner, 2012. LXVI, 354 S.

8. Aristoteles. Rhetorik, Übers. und erläutert von Chr. Rapp. 1. Hb. Berlin, Akademie Verlag, 2002. 1007 S.

9. Bonitz H. Index Aristotelicus. Berlin, Reimer, 1870. 878 p.

10. Burkert W. Aristoteles im Th eater. Zur Datierung des 3. Buches der “Rhetoric” und der “Poetic”. Museum Helveticum. Bd. 32. 1975. S. 67–72.

11. Düring I. Aristoteles: Darstellung und Interpretation seines Denkens. 2e Aufl., Nachdruck der Ausg. von 1966. Heidelberg, Winter, 2005. XV, 670 p.

12. Else G. F. The Structure and Date of Book 10 of Plato’s Republic. Heidelberg, Winter, 1972. 74 S.

13. Else G. F. Plato and Aristotle on Poetry. Chapel Hill, University of North Carolina Press; London, 1986. XXI, 221 p.

14. Flashar H. Aristoteles und Brecht. Poetica. № 6. 1974. S. 36.

15. Jaeger W. Studien zur Entstehungsgeschichte der Metaphysik des Aristoteles. Berlin, 1912. S. 131–148.

16. Jaeger W. Aristoteles. Grundlegung einer Geschichte seiner Entwicklung. Berlin, Weidmann, 1923. 438 S.

17. Halliwell S. Aristotle’s Poetics. London, Duckworth, 1986. XI, 69 p.

18. Moraux P. Les Listes Anciennes des Ouvrages d’Aristote. Louvain, Éditions Universitaires, 1951. X, 391 p.

19. Solmsen F. Theodectes. Realencyclopädie. Bd. VA-10. 1934. S. 1726–1727.

20. Susemihl F. Kleine Beiträge zur Geschichte der griechischen Tragödie. Rheinisches Museum. Bd. 54. 1899. S. 473–476.

21. Thielscher P. Die relative Chronologie der erhaltenen Schrift en des Aristoteles nach den bestimmten Selbstzitaten. Philologus. 1948. Bd. 97. S. 229–265.

22. Vahlen J. Beiträge zu Aristoteles’ Poetik. Teil III. Wien, Gerold in Komm., 1867. S. 213–439.

Published

2014-12-31

How to Cite

Pozdnev, M. (2014). When the Poetics of Aristotle was actually written?. Philologia Classica, 9, 150–167. Retrieved from https://philclass.spbu.ru/article/view/7678

Issue

Section

I. Ancient Greek Language and Literature