Some Remarks on Grammatical Aspect in Latin

Authors

  • Olga Spevak Université de Toulouse 2 JJ. Département de lettres et de langues anciennes Bâtiment Gai savoir 5, allées Antonio Machado 310 58, Toulouse, cedex 9, France

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21638/11701/spbu20.2016.207

Abstract

The existence of grammatical aspect in Latin is a much discussed issue. The main aim of this article is to review different approaches to this question and to discuss important arguments that have to be taken into consideration. Besides the traditional view according to which there is an aspectual difference between the infectum and perfectum stems, two other arguments claiming the existence of aspect in Latin have been proposed: aspect as a category inherited from Indo-European and aspectual difference between the Latin perfect and imperfect tense. On the one hand, I will argue that the difference between the perfect and the imperfect is of a temporal nature and that the Latin perfect is used both for telic (terminative) states of affairs and atelic (non-terminative) ones. Furthermore, the Latin perfect combines with expressions of duration which, except for special cases, are excluded with Russian perfective verbs.

Keywords:

Grammatical (verbal) aspect, perfect tense, imperfect tense, perfective, imperfective, duration, narrative, foreground, background

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
 

References

Comrie B. Aspect: An Introduction to the Study of Verbal Aspect and Related Problems. Cambridge, CUP, 1976.

Černý J. O vzniku a vývoji gramatických kategorií [On the origin and development of grammatical categories], Slovo a slovesnost 1970, 31, 207–222 (In Czech).

Dostál A. Studie o vidovém systému v staroslověnštině. Prague, SPN, 1954 [A study on the aspectual system in Old Church Slavonic] (in Czech).

Haverling G. Actionality, tense, and viewpoint, in: P. Cuzzolin and Ph. Baldi (eds.), New Perspectives on Historical Latin Syntax, 2, Constituent Syntax: Adverbial Phrases, Adverbs, Mood, Tense, Berlin, Mouton de Gruyter, 2010, 277–523.

Havránek B.Aspect et temps du verbe en vieux slave, in: Mélanges de linguistique offerts à Charles Bally, Genève, Georg 1939, 223–230.

Heyde van der, K. Composita en verbaal aspect bij Plautus, dissertation, Amsterdam, 1926.

Kravar M. Pitanja glogolskogo vida u latinskom jeziku. [Questions of verbal aspect in Latin language] Skopje, Živa antika, 1980 (In Chroatian).

Maslov Y.An outline of contrastive aspectology, in: Y.Maslov (ed.), Contrastive Studies in Verbal Aspect in Russian, French, and German, Heidelberg, Groos, 1985, 1–44.

Meillet A. and Vendryès, J. Traité de grammaire comparée des langues classiques. Paris, Champion, 21948.

Meillet A. De l’expression de l’aoriste en latin. Revue de Philologie 1897, 21, 81–90.

Oldsjö F. Tense and Aspect in Caesar’s Narrative. Uppsala, UP, 2001.

Pinkster H.Tempus, Aspect, and Aktionsart in Latin, in: W.Haase (ed.), Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt 2, 29, 1, Berlin, De Gruyter, 1983, 270–320.

Pinkster H. The Oxford Latin Syntax. Oxford, OUP, 2015.

Szantyr A. Lateinische Syntax und Stilistik. Munich, C. H. Beck, 1972.

Szemerényi O. The origin of aspect in the Indo-European languages. Glotta 1987, 65, 1–18.

Torrego E. Restricciones de la categoría verbal aspecto sobre los elementos de duración en latín. Minerva 1989, 2, 259–278.

Tronsky I. M. Bemerkungen zum Aspekt- und Tempussystem des lateinischen Verbums, in: K. Strunk (ed.), Probleme der lateinischen Grammatik, Darmstadt, WB, 1973, 354–367.

Vendler Z., Verbs and times, in Z. Vendler, Linguistics in Philosophy, 1957/1967, 97–121.

Weinrich H. Tempus: Besprochene und erzählte Welt. Stuttgart, Kohlhammer, 1964.

Downloads

Published

2017-03-01

How to Cite

Spevak, O. (2017). Some Remarks on Grammatical Aspect in Latin. Philologia Classica, 11(2), 282–288. https://doi.org/10.21638/11701/spbu20.2016.207

Issue

Section

Orbis Romanus